Defining Liberalism and Conservatism

The word liberal, if in its Anglo-Norman and Middle French etymological comprehend, can be apply to a grandparent generous in large(p) their favorite grandson an iniquitous graduation present, such as a car. It can pick up a person frank to refreshful behavior or opinions or an individual who is will to be open-minded and non beholden to conventional wisdom. In education, being liberal has ordained connotation, because it means the student is a person striving to dramatize his experience and understanding. It means he is willing to go beyond rote exercises of memorization and is talkative in his willingness to learn. The Oxford English dictionary (OED ) defines liberal  primarily as Free in giving; generous, magnanimous  (OED). The etymology set onwards is:\nAnglo-Norman and Middle French . . . loosen in giving, generous, benevolent, magnanimous (12th cent. in Old French), suitable for a free or alarming person (c1200; especially of studies, education, arts, pr ofessions), independent, free (14th cent.), (of the will) free (14th cent.), of noble acquit (14th cent.), (with reference to the ancient world) free, not servile (late 14th cent.), oration freely (c1480)  (OED, emphasis added).\n plentiful is a word with a wonderful definition, right? afterward all, what could be negative rough being magnanimous, generous, open to culture new things, and even better, new thought processes? Wouldnt any dumb ensnare want her son or daughter to grow up to be liberal?\nThe solution is, more than half of the unify States not only does not want their child to be liberal, but the mere observation of the word raises their blood coerce to stroke range. In fact, no matter how certain dictionaries may define the word liberal,  its substance has been hijacked by political rhetoric, and not in the positive sense originally associated with the word.\nA diachronic overview is beneficial to the first diverseness of negative connotation found in the use of the word. Liberal...